You are here

A high abundance of massive galaxies 3-6 billion years after the Big Bang

Content has no owner

July 7, 2004

A Gemini team led by Karl Galzebrook of Johns Hopkins University has just released some spectacular results obtained from the Gemini Deep Deep Survey (GDDS) in the British journal Nature.

Image from Hubble Space Telescope showing a portion of a field containing GDDS galaxies. The larger, brighter galaxies in the foreground are not part of the GDDS survey. The faint, smaller galaxies scattered throughout the image are likely to be GDDS galaxies.

Image Courtesy of Hubble Space Telescope 

A Hubble Space Telescope image showing a section of one of the GDDS fields. The larger galaxies in this image are foreground objects, the GDDS galaxies are among the small faint galaxies in this sample field.

The team found that at last two-thirds of massive galaxies appeared after the first 3 billion years following the Big Bang. However, a significant fraction of them are already in place in the early Universe.

The GDDS was completed using the Gemini North telescope and the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS-N). The team observed four widely-separated 30 arcmin2 fields. The spectroscopic exposure time for each field was about 30,000 seconds. The spectrograph was operated in the Nod & Shuffle mode. This technique enables the removal of contamination by the earth’s atmospheric luminescence to a high degree. Spectra of several hundred distant galaxies were obtained and measured.

This plot shows the distribution of galaxies in the GDDS survey by mass, redshift (distance), and age. Redder points represent older, more massive galaxies. The plot suggests that a significant portion (30%) of the universe's stellar mass at redshifts between 1.2 and 1.8 is made up of these red, older galaxies.
Figure 1: Stellar mass-redshift/age distribution of the GDDS galaxies. The color code (see key on lower left) show the observed K-band magnitude of the galaxies. Circle/star shape symbols denote objects respectively redder or bluer in V-I than a model Sbc spiral galaxy template. Symbol size is keyed to the I-band magnitude. The horizontal line denotes the characteristic Schechter mass scale in the local universe. These results show that red, old galaxies make a large contribution (30%) to the stellar mass in the Universe at the redshift range of 1.2 < z < 1.8.

As has been suspected, massive, evolved galaxies are found at an epoch earlier than half of the present age of the universe. However, the discovery of such massive, evolved galaxies at much greater distances than expected – and hence at earlier times in the history of the universe – is a challenge to our understanding of how galaxies form. Hierarchical galaxy formation is the model whereby massive galaxies form from an assembly of smaller units. The most massive objects form more slowly, thus appear last. The GDDS results challenge this model.

Plot shows how the density of stellar mass changes with distance (redshift). Massive galaxies (filled circles) seem to decline in density over time, but not faster than the overall galaxy population.
Figure 2: Mass density in stars versus redshift. A clear decline with redshift in stellar mass locked up in the most massive galaxies is observed, but surprisingly, the massive galaxies do not decline more rapidly than the whole population. The GDDS points are represented by the filled circles with horizontal and vertical error bars. Theoretical models of hierarchical galaxy formation are plotted as full lines. The GDDS finds the number of massive galaxies almost 100 times higher than predicted by the models.

The GDDS represent a unique and extremely deep spectroscopic data set providing significant new insights into galaxy populations in the era of a few billion years after the Big Bang.

For more details see the News and views Nature article “Old before their time” by Gregory D. Wirth (Nature, vol. 430, 8 July 2004, pp. 149-150) and the original GDDS III article “A high abundance of massive galaxies 3-6 billion years after the Big Bang” (Nature, vol. 430, 8 July 2004, pp. 181-184). The figures are from this article. 

News Archive Filter