You are here

Performance

Content owned by astephens

Sensitivity and Overheads

For sensitivities of ALTAIR use the GNIRS, NIRI, or NIFS Integration Time Calculators. However, please see here for some restrictions regarding use of the ITC, including use at L'.

The additional observing overhead due to Altair in both NGS and LGS modes has been measured to be about 5 minutes except for NIFS + LGS which takes an additional 8 minutes. These estimates come from the Observatory Statistics webpage. The overhead is generally small because if the coordinates are accurate, the guide star generally falls within or very close to the WFS field stop, and the loop can be closed in a few minutes.

The actual overhead time is not easily predictable as it depends on distance from the previous target, the field crowdedness, the faintness of the guide star, the accuracy of the guide star magnitude and the detail of the finder chart. Once the guide star is acquired, everything behaves as in regular operation with GNIRS, NIFS, or NIRI, and the overhead associated with those instruments applies (see the GNIRS, NIFS, and NIRI overheads sections).


Corrected Image Quality

Introduction

The delivered Strehl ratio (the ratio of the delivered peak intensity to the theoretical peak intensity) is dependent on many factors, such as the natural seeing and stability of the atmosphere, the wavelength of the observations, the brightness of the guide star, the separation between the science target and the guide star, and of course the performance of the telescope and adaptive optics system. In general the Strehl ratio in NGS mode will be better than in LGS mode, and the Strehl ratio in LGS mode will be better than in "LGS + P1" mode, but please see the relevant sections for more information.

Bright Star PSFs

We have assembled an Altair image library based on real observations of bright stars in a variety of seeing conditions and NIRI instrument filters.  These are all actual images from Altair science programs.  Please note that actual performance could very well vary from the image library, potentially being better or worse depending on environmental and instrumental conditions.  However, generally performance achieved should be similar to the image library.  For PIs requiring very strict delivered image quality criteria, it is suggested that a delivered image quality criteria be clearly stated in the science proposal and, if approved, communicated to the Contact Scientist at the Phase II level to create a delivered image quality criteria.

PSF Stars

When observing a resolved target without nearby point sources it may be desirable to observe a known point source to determine the point spread function (PSF) of the telescope + AO + instrument + atmosphere. Due to the time variability of the atmosphere and the difficulty of matching the observing parameters, it is impossible to know the exact PSF in a field where there are no point sources. That said, it is possible to estimate the PSF by observing a point source (a "PSF star") before and/or after a science observation.

A PSF star should:

  1. Be relatively close on the sky, ideally less than 5 degrees away
  2. Have a guide star which is about the same brightness as the one used for science (|dm|<0.5 mag)
  3. Be at a similar distance from the guide star as is the science (|dr|<3")
  4. Have a guide star which is at a similar position angle as is used for the science observation (|dPA|<20 deg)
  5. Be relatively bright to minimize the overhead of the additional observation

ITC Strehl Relations

The Integration Time Calculators (ITCs) estimate the Strehl which may be expected for a given observation. While these are only limited estimates, we have plotted the ITC relations below as a guide to help understand how the Strehl should vary with different observation parameters.

Strehl vs magnitude
Strehl as a function of guide star magnitude plotted for different guide star separations ranging from 0 to 28 arcseconds.
Strehl vs seeing at 0 arcsec Strehl vs seeing at 12 arcsec
Strehl as a function of natural seeing plotted for different wavelengths ranging from 1 to 2.5 microns with the guide star on-axis (left) and 12 arcseconds off-axis (right).
Strehl vs separation
Strehl as a function of guide star distance plotted for different guide star magnitudes ranging from 10 - 15.
Strehl vs wavelength at 0 arcsec Strehl vs wavelength at 12 arcsec
Strehl as a function of wavelength plotted for different values of the natural seeing ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 arcseconds with the guide star on-axis (left) and 12 arcseconds off-axis (right).

Image Library

(Examples of NGS - AO - NIRI Setups)

NIRI instrument details here

ALTAIR instrument details here

Filter IQ Seeing
[arcsec]
Strehl FWHM
[arcsec]
Air Mass Image Example
K-prime 20% 0.361 0.30 0.070 1.075 N20091029S0106.fits
K-prime 70% 0.553 0.17 0.096 1.217 N20081209S0200.fits
K-prime 70% 0.670 0.16 0.082 1.253 N20091125S0178.fits
K-prime 85% 1.046 0.08 0.089 1.094 N20091120S0110.fits
K-continuum 20% 0.327 0.27 0.085 1.018 N20091024S0190.fits
H 20% 0.359 0.13 0.065 1.073 N20091029S0108.fits
H-continuum 20% 0.317 0.20 0.065 1.193 N20080907S0025.fits
J 20% 0.412 0.04 0.074 1.126 N20090513S0378.fits
J-continuum 20% 0.358 0.03 0.096 1.063 N20091024S0156.fits



 K-prime Filter

IQ-20%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20091029S0106.fits Strehl: 0.30                Delivered Seeing: 0.361"               FWHM: 0.070"             Air Mass: 1.075



 K-prime Filter

IQ-70%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20081209S0200.fits Strehl: 0.17                Delivered Seeing: 0.553"               FWHM: 0.096"              Air Mass: 1.217



 K-prime Filter

IQ-70%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20091125S0178.fits Strehl: 0.16                Delivered Seeing: 0.670"               FWHM: 0.082"              Air Mass: 1.253



 K-prime Filter

IQ-85%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20091120S0110.fits Strehl: 0.08                Delivered Seeing: 1.046"               FWHM: 0.089"              Air Mass: 1.094



 K-continuum Filter

 IQ-20%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20091024S0190.fits Strehl: 0.27                Delivered Seeing: 0.327"               FWHM: 0.085"              Air Mass: 1.018



 H Filter

 IQ-20%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns  Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
 N20091029S0108.fits Strehl: 0.13                Delivered Seeing: 0.359"               FWHM: 0.065"              Air Mass: 1.073



 H-continuum Filter

 IQ-20%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20080907S0025.fits Strehl: 0.20                Delivered Seeing: 0.317"               FWHM: 0.065"              Air Mass: 1.193



 J Filter

 IQ-20%

Image obtained

Chart of lines vs columns Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
N20090513S0378.fits Strehl: 0.04                Delivered Seeing: 0.412"               FWHM: 0.074"              Air Mass: 1.126



 J-continuum Filter

 IQ-20%

Image obtained Chart of lines vs columns  Chart of Pixel Value vs Radius
 N20091024S0156.fits Strehl: 0.03                Delivered Seeing: 0.358"               FWHM: 0.096"              Air Mass: 1.063


Performance | Gemini Observatory

Error

The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.