GEMINI OBSERVATORY
observing time request (HTML summary)

Semester: 2002AGemini reference:
Not Available
Partner reference:
GS-2001B-03
Observing mode: queueInstruments(s):
NIRI, GMOS North
Partner ranking: 8
PI time requested:
15.0 hours
PI total from all partners: 30.0 hours
(joint proposals)
PI future time requested:
0.0 nights
PI minimum time requested:
8.0 hours
NTAC recommended time:
10.0 hours
NTAC minimum recommended:
10.0 hours
Proposal submitted to: Gemini Staff...also to...Canada, United States
(joint proposals)


Title:Molecular Hydrogen Excitation in Actively Star-forming Dwarf Galaxies
Principal Investigator:Phil Puxley
PI institution:Gemini Observatory - North, Gemini Observatory,670 N. Aohoku Place,Hilo,HI,96720,USA
PI status:PhD/Doctorate
PI phone / fax / e-mail:808-974-2501 / 808-935-9650 / ppuxley@gemini.edu
Co-investigators:Matt Mountain: Gemini Observatory - North, mmountain@gemini.edu

jump to table of contents

Abstract: We propose to observe a small sample of weak-continuum , dwarf galaxies to investigate the excitation of molecular hydrogen in massive star-forming complexes. In the usable fraction of our previous allocation we were able to observe one of our targets, NGC5461. This dataset unambiguously shows that the gas is excited in low density photo-dissociation regions, contrary to the widespread assumption in the literature that the H2 in galaxies is predominantly shock excited. The weakness of the dwarf galaxy continua permits detection of the higher level H2 transitions which are essential to determine the gas excitation and relative contributions of thermal and UV-excited gas.

Science Justification

Background: H2 Observations of Galaxies

A number of studies of molecular hydrogen and its excitation in galaxies have been made over the last decade (e.g. Joseph et al. 1984; Puxley, Hawarden & Mountain 1988, 1990; Moorwood & Oliva 1990; Kawara & Taniguchi 1993; van der Werf et al. 1993). Early indications from low spatial and spectral resolution H2 line ratios that the gas was always shock excited were challenged by parallel theoretical developments showing that in dense, warm photo-dissociation regions heated by UV-photons the low-lying (and brightest) transitions could be thermalised. Moreover, Puxley et al. (1990) argued that given the observed Br-gamma recombination line emission, the copious non-ionizing UV photons would be expected to produce substantial H2 emission when absorbed by molecular gas. Indeed, the different dependences of H and H2 emission on incident UV flux provided a diagnostic of the relative spatial distributions of exciting stars and gas. Despite these arguments, however, it remains widespread in the current literature that H2 in galaxies is shock excited (by supernova remnants and stellar outflows), although these studies are invariably without detection or reliable analysis of the critical higher level line fluxes.

One of the principal difficulties in determining accurate fluxes for H2 lines above the lowest v=1-0 transitions is the strength of the underlying stellar continuum and the presence of metal absorption features in the cool stellar atmospheres. Even with very high S/N data, local variations in stellar population and element abundance produces systematic features after subtraction of empirical or theoretical stellar templates. This restricts the detectability in galaxies with strong continua to transitions brighter than those required to definitively determine the H2 excitation.

The wider astrophysical context for studying H2 emission from galaxies is in understanding the interaction between massive stars and their environment (e.g. the relative importance of the excitation mechanisms, the effect of the formation of massive star clusters on the local ISM and its feedback into the star-formation process), the distribution of stars and interstellar material and the subsequent evolution of the starburst. Paradoxically, within our own galaxy it can be difficult to establish, say, the H and H2 emission and excitation mechanisms for a single star-forming complex. For example, although the peak H2 flux from shocks is 100 times that from the diffuse component in Orion, only by integrating over a 7 x 9 arcmin2 region is it revealed that the shocked and UV-excited luminosities are equal (Burton & Puxley 1990; Usuda et al. 1996). Observation of a galaxy provides such a census of the entire emission in a single measurement.

During an IR spectroscopic study of several Wolf-Rayet galaxies, four lines of H2 were serendipitously detected in the nearby dwarf galaxy NGC5253 (Lumsden, Puxley & Doherty 1994) : 1-0 S(1), 1-0 S(0) and marginally 3-2 S(3) and 2-1 S(1). This observation represented the first suggestive evidence for the dominance of UV-photon excitation of H2 in at least some galaxies, now strongly supported by the spectrum of NGC5461 in M101 (Fig. 1).

Proposed Observations

The NGC5253 and NGC5461 observations raise several interesting questions: Is UV-excitation of H2 actually a general phenomenon in galaxies? What are the relative fractions of UV- and thermally-excited gas? What does the UV-excited component and hydrogen recombination line emission imply about the physical relationship of sources in the emitting region e.g. are they consistent with the models described by Puxley, Hawarden & Mountain (1988, 1990)?

To address these questions we require measurements of the H2 line excitations sufficient to determine the contributions from UV irradiated low and high density gas, and from shocks. Hence we propose observations of a sample of weak continuum, dwarf galaxies. All of the galaxies have been detected in the 1-0 S(1) H2 transition (Doherty, Puxley, Lumsden & Doyon 1995). The weakness of the continua provides two benefits (i) a relatively large H2-to-continuum ration and (ii) weak underlying stellar absorption features.


Technical Justification

Images with NIRI f/6 camera are requested of four weak-continuum, blue compact dwarf galaxies (NGC5253, Haro2, Haro3, IIZw40). The giant HII region NGC5461 (in M101) previously observed provides a 'bridge' between studies of the starburst nuclei of galaxies and Orion-like complexes in our own Galaxy.

The expected continuum flux density in NGC5253 is 0.5 x 10-15 W/m2/um (K ~ 14.7) assuming approximately uniform surface brightness in scaling from our previous 3 x 3 arcsec^2 measurement.

Similar previous observations of the rest of the sample gives expected continuum flux densities of 0.5 - 2 x 10-15 W/m2/um (K ~13.3-14.8) and 1-0 S(1) line / continuum ratios of 0.5-1.0. The galaxies with weaker continua have larger line/continuum ratios and thus we expect similar integration times.

The total request to observe the four targets, allowing 1 hour per target for calibration and acquisition, and 75% efficiency on long integrations is 15 hours.


Observation Details

ObservationRADecBrightnessTotal Time
(including overheads)
NGC525313:39:55.3-31:38:2510.87B, 10.55V, 14.7K3.0 hours
     GSC0726600038 (wfs)13:40:17.297-31:34:33.1312.35 magseparation 6.07
     observing conditions: Best conditionsresources: Imaging
Haro210:32:32.054:24:03.513.2B, 13.4V2.0 hours
     GSC0381600514 (wfs)10:32:34.59654:30:55.1910.76 magseparation 6.87
     observing conditions: Global Defaultresources: Imaging
Haro310:45:22.155:57:3812.9B2.0 hours
     GSC0382600368 (wfs)10:44:50.45356:02:14.0314.47 magseparation 6.38
     observing conditions: Global Defaultresources: Imaging
IIZw4005:55:42.703:23:0714.22B8.0 hours
     GSC0012100097 (wfs)5:56:01.623:27:45.7912.41 magseparation 6.62
     observing conditions: Global Defaultresources: GMOS Spec1

Resources

Observing Conditions
NameImage QualitySky BackgroundWater VaporCloud Cover
Global DefaultAnyAnyAnyAny
Best conditions20%20%20%20%

Scheduling Information:

Optimal dates:

Impossible dates: 2001/5/15-2001/6/13
Reason: SPIE meeting


Allocation Committee Comments

NTAC Comment

We think this proposal should be scheduled

Additional Information

Keyword Category: Extra Galactic

Keywords: Emission lines, Starburst galaxies

Publications: Publications:


Proposal Contents

Summary
Investigators
Abstract
Science Justification
Technical Justification
Observation Details
Allocation Committee Comments
Additional Information