Deep near infrared Gemini observations with NIRI refute alleged redshift z = 10 galaxy
Eight meter-class telescopes such as Gemini, the Very Large Telescope (VLT), Subaru and Keck have opened up the high-redshift universe for detailed study. Several galaxies out to redshifts of z ~ 6.6 are now known and Gemini has played a significant role in their discovery: "Searching for the end of the cosmic dark ages with GMOS", "Gemini Probes Galaxy Evolution a Billion Years After the Big Bang". Finding even more distant galaxies is particularly important to our understanding of the formation of the very first stellar objects in the history of the universe, and of the ensuing reionization of the intergalactic medium. This epoch of “first light” at redshifts between ~7-15 marked the end of the early universe’s dark ages – a time when the universe was filled with mostly neutral hydrogen.
Recently, Pelló et al. (Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 416,
p. 35,
2004) identified a possible highly magnified object which they
interpreted to be a Lyman break galaxy at z=10. A major part of the case that this object is at z = 10
was
the presence of a strong continuum break between the J and H bands,
attributed to absorption of all continuum shortward of 1216 Å in
the
rest frame of the object. The object was not detected in V, R
and
I optical bands and was formally only detected at more than 4 sigma
in
H (HAB = 25.00 +/-0.25) and about 3 sigma in K
(Ks,AB = 25.51
+/-0.36). The J-band detection quoted by
Pelló et al. was JAB =
26.8 +/-1.0. They also
observed an emission line in the spectrum
of the object, which they
interpreted as Lyman alpha at a redshift of
z=10 because of the break
between the J and H bands.
An
international team led by
Malcolm Bremer (University of Bristol, UK)
and including Joe Jensen
(Gemini Observatory) used the Gemini North
Near Infrared Imager (NIRI)
to obtain even deeper H-band images of
the field of the possible z=10
galaxy.
The observations were
made on 30 May and 6 June 2004
at Gemini North, when Bremer’s team
imaged the field at H with
NIRI to better constrain the photometry and
morphology of the
object. The Gemini image is significantly
deeper than the existing
H-band image obtained with ISAAC on the Very
Large Telescope
(Pelló et al. 2004). The object is not detected
in the
Gemini data (Figure 1). The object should have been
detected at
more than ~7 sigma in a 1.4” diameter aperture. This
non-detection
by Gemini means there is no evidence for a break between
the J and H
bands and consequently casts significant doubt on the reality of
the
z=10 galaxy.
![]() |
| Figure 1. Gemini/NIRI H-band image (left panel) of z = 10 candidate. Exposure time was 22.6 ksec in 0.”47 seeing. The image on the right is the 13.9 ksec VLT/ISAAC H-band image of the same field under ~0.”50 seeing. The circles show the location of the purported object. Several faint objects that are undetected or marginally detected in the ISAAC image are apparent in the NIRI image. |
Other
independent work has
recently thrown doubt on the reality of the
spectral line in the
ISAAC/VLT spectrum. Taken together with the Bremer
et al. work, the
reality of any source at this position has to be
strongly questioned.
Even if the emission line is real, it is more
likely to be something
other than Lyman alpha. For example, it is
entirely possible that it
could be the brightest line (eg [OII]3727,
[OIII]5007, H-alpha) emitted
by a low surface brightness star forming
galaxy at 1.0<z<2.6. Such
a galaxy could well be too faint to
detect in the published optical
imaging. The conclusion is that the
purported ISAAC object is not a
Lyman-break galaxy at z=10, and quite
possibly nothing at all…
For more details, see the paper
by Malcolm N. Bremer, Joseph B.
Jensen, Matt. D. Lehnert, N. M. Forster
Schreiber and Laura Douglas, “Gemini H-band imaging of the field of a z
= 10 candidate”, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 615 (November 1,
2004 issue).
![]() |
| Figure 2. Same Gemini image as in Figure 1 (left panel), this time with positions of four other sources near the candidate object with HAB ~ 25. These are barely visible or undetected in the VLT data shown in Figure 1 (right panel). In addition, the objects labeled “Art” are artificial sources with HAB = 25.0. The three artificial sources were used to assess the detectability of objects with this brightness in the NIRI image. |

